![\"Kepiyak\u00e9ng](\"https:\/\/internationalpoliticsjournal.com\/\/jv\/wp-content\/uploads\/shared\/parliament-317085_1280.jpg\")
“`html<\/p>\n“`html<\/p>\n
Kabar palsu cepet nyebar ing media sosial, ngluwihi cara konsumen nggawe pandang marang merek lan perusahaan. Studi anyar nggambarake y\u00e8n kabar palsu iku cocog karo kepiyak\u00e9ng agama atawa politik siji wong, ngluwihi bias konfirmasi psikologis. Bias iku nganti wong-wong milih informasi sing ngukuhi keyakinan sing wis ana, sabanjure ngaba informasi sing nduweni kontradiksi.<\/p>\n
Hasil studi nggambarake y\u00e8n wong-wong sing diwenehi kabar palsu sing cocog karo nilai agama atawa politik, luwih gampang nggawe informasi mau jadi bener. Fenomena iku khususan terlihat ing wong-wong sing keyakinan\u00e9 kuat. Misal\u00e9, wong sing religius banget luwih gampang percaya kabar palsu sing ngandung nilai kaya kesucian atawa otoritas, amarga informasi mau cocog karo prinsip moral\u00e9. Sabanjure, wong sing pendapat politik\u00e9 kuat luwih gampang nerima informasi sing salah tapi ngukuhi posisin\u00e9, kaya tuduhan bias pemilihan.<\/p>\n
Media sosial duw\u00e9 peran penting ing dinamika iku. Algoritma\u00e9 nganti konten sing ngundang reaksi emosional atawa moral, ngluwihi kabar palsu sing cocog karo identitas agama atawa politik penggunan\u00e9. Iku nggawe gelembung informasi diarani wong-wong luwih sering diwenehi konten sing ngukuhi pendapat sing wis ana. Ing lingkungan kaya iku, kabar palsu luwih cepet nyebar lan ngluwihi perilaku konsumen, kaya pembelian atawa kepercayaan marang merek.<\/p>\n
Studi iku uga nggambarake y\u00e8n bias konfirmasi ngurangi interaksi ing media sosial. Y\u00e8n wong-wong nemoni informasi sing cocog karo keyakinan\u00e9, ora nganti semangat nggawe interaksi, apik\u00e9 like, share, atawa komentar. Iku amarga informasi mau wis kelar bener menawa pandang\u00e9, nggawe motivasi\u00e9 nganti ora ngerti. Fenomena iku luwih terlihat ing wong-wong sing keyakinan agama atawa politik\u00e9 kuat.<\/p>\n
Para peneliti ngidentifikasi telu tipe konsumen ing hadapi kabar palsu. Amplifikator ideologis<\/em>, sing 38% saka sampel, duw\u00e9 bias konfirmasi sing gedhe lan interaksi sing alit, amarga cepet nerima informasi sing cocog karo keyakinan\u00e9. Skeptis<\/em>, sing 42% saka peserta, duw\u00e9 bias sing moderat lan interaksi sing sedang, bareng karo pendidikan media sing apik atawa keyakinan sing ora kaku. Terus, Apatis<\/em>, sing 20% saka wong-wong, alit interaksin\u00e9 karo konten, apik\u00e9 bener atawa palsu, bareng karo curiga atawa ora peduli.<\/p>\n Mekanisme iku duw\u00e9 dampak langsung marang pandang marang perusahaan. Kabar palsu bisa ngrusak reputasi merek, ngowahi kebiasaan beli, atawa nganti boikot. Misal\u00e9, kabar palsu sing ora bener y\u00e8n perusahaan mendukung sebab kontroversial bisa ngowahi kepercayaan konsumen, apik\u00e9 y\u00e8n kabar iku cocog karo prasangka ideologis\u00e9. Sabanjure, kabar palsu sing menguntungkan merek bisa ngluwihi loyalitas pelanggan sing nilain\u00e9 cocog karo nilai sing diusung ing pesen.<\/p>\n Implikasi saka studi iku akeh. Kanggo para ahli pemasaran, penting nggerteni cara keyakinan pribadi ngluwihi cara penerimaan informasi. Kampanye komunikasi bisa disesuaikan nggawe ngatasi kabar palsu sabanjure nganti nilai moral saka target audiens. Misal\u00e9, nggawe nggarap audiens religius, bisa efektif nggawe nilai kaya kesucian atawa otoritas, sabanjure kanggo audiens sing aktif politik, argumen sing didasari keadilan atawa loyalitas bisa luwih relevan.<\/p>\n Platform media sosial, sabanjure, bisa nggawe sistem peringatan sing luwih ditargetkan. Alih-alih peringatan generik, pesen sing dipersonalisasi bisa ditampilkan nggawe penggunan\u00e9 nggawe pertanyaan marang informasi sing cocog karo keyakinan\u00e9. Misal\u00e9, penggunan\u00e9 sing pendapat politik\u00e9 kuat bisa nerima notifikasi nggawe verifikasi fakta sablum share informasi sing kelar ngukuhi keyakinan\u00e9.<\/p>\n Terus, kanggo para pembuat kebijakan, hasil iku nggambarake penting\u00e9 ngembangkan program pendidikan media sing disesuaikan karo tipe konsumen sing beda. Amplifikator ideologis<\/em> bisa untung saka pelatihan sing ngembangkan pikiran kritis, sabanjure skeptis<\/em> bisa didorong nggawe interaksi luwih akeh karo sumber sing terpercaya. Sabanjure, kanggo apatis<\/em>, inisiatif nggawe restorasi kepercayaan marang informasi sing kredibel bisa diwujudkan.<\/p>\n Studi iku nggambarake mekanisme kompleks diarani kabar palsu, sabanjure ngandalkan keyakinan agama lan politik, nggawe perilaku konsumen. Iku nggawe solusi konkret nggawe ngurangi dampak\u00e9 ing dunia digital sing luwih polarisasi.<\/p>\n “`<\/p>\n DOI\u00a0:<\/strong> https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10767-026-09584-2<\/a><\/p>\n Titre\u00a0:<\/strong> Ideological Influences on Fake News: How Religious and Political Orientations Amplify Confirmation Bias and Attenuate Social Media Engagement<\/p>\n Revue : <\/strong> International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society<\/p>\n \u00c9diteur : <\/strong> Springer Science and Business Media LLC<\/p>\n Auteurs : <\/strong> Mirza Amin ul Haq; Wang Jing; Arsalan Mujahid Ghouri; Ngan Thi Luong; Minh Thi Hong Le; Syed Taha; Pervaiz Akhtar<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" “`html Kepiyak\u00e9ng Pangg\u00e9ling Agama lan Politik Ngluwihi Panyebar Kabar Palsu Kabar palsu cepet nyebar ing media sosial, ngluwihi cara konsumen nggawe pandang marang merek lan perusahaan. Studi anyar nggambarake y\u00e8n kabar palsu iku cocog karo kepiyak\u00e9ng agama atawa politik siji wong, ngluwihi bias konfirmasi psikologis. Bias iku nganti wong-wong milih informasi sing ngukuhi keyakinan sing… Continue reading Kepiyak\u00e9ng Pangg\u00e9ling Agama lan Politik Ngluwihi Panyebar Kabar Palsu<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,4,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ilmu-teknologi","category-lingkungan","category-manusia","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/internationalpoliticsjournal.com\/jv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/internationalpoliticsjournal.com\/jv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/internationalpoliticsjournal.com\/jv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/internationalpoliticsjournal.com\/jv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/internationalpoliticsjournal.com\/jv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/internationalpoliticsjournal.com\/jv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16,"href":"https:\/\/internationalpoliticsjournal.com\/jv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15\/revisions\/16"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/internationalpoliticsjournal.com\/jv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/internationalpoliticsjournal.com\/jv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/internationalpoliticsjournal.com\/jv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nNos r\u00e9f\u00e9rences<\/h2>\n
Travail de r\u00e9f\u00e9rence<\/h3>\n